Judicial Bodies and Forums

Belongs To Collection(s)
    > student handbook us edition
    > student code of conduct

There are four types of conduct forums: warning letter without a hearing, summary resolution meeting, informal hearing, and formal hearing. Generally, students and student organizations may choose which conduct forum they would like to conduct their disciplinary case. However, the dean of students (or designee) or director for housing and residential life (or designee) reserve the right to choose the appropriate forum for administrative or case-related reasons.

a. Warning Letter Without a Hearing

For minor infractions of this code, the dean of students (or designee), or director of housing and residential life (or designee) may send the student a warning letter. The letter states that if the student takes full responsibility for the alleged violation, and any imposed sanctions, then the letter will act as a warning. If the student does not accept responsibility for the alleged violation of the code, then the student must schedule an information meeting to schedule an informal or formal hearing.

b. Summary Resolution Meeting

Summary resolution meetings are for students electing to accept responsibility for the alleged violation as presented. These meetings are not recorded and are conducted by the dean of students (or designee) as the student conduct officer, or by the director of residence life and off-campus housing (or designee) for cases related to housing and residence life.

c. Informal Hearings

Informal hearings are for students electing to enable the determination of responsibility for the alleged violation to be made by the dean of students (or designee) as the student conduct officer, or by the director of residence life and off-campus housing (or designee) for cases related to housing and residence life.

d. Formal Hearings

The student conduct body for formal hearings: the Student Conduct Board, comprising the dean of students (or designee) as the chair/nonvoting capacity; up to four faculty members from different schools, appointed by the provost and vice president for academic affairs; up to four students appointed by the Student Government Association; and up to three administrators from different departments, appointed by the dean of students (or designee). The chair selects one faculty member, one student, and one administrator to hear each case and members serve on a rotating basis for cases that do not involve violations of the Gender Based Misconduct Policy. For cases involving violations of the Gender Based Misconduct Policy, students will not serve on the hearing panel. Rather, the chair will select three panel members from the appointed pool of faculty members and administrators. However, only those faculty and administrators who have completed additional training in the area of gender based misconduct will be eligible to serve in such cases. Hearings may also include an Investigator, an NYIT staff member appointed to review the case and present findings to the student conduct body. Formal hearings:

  1. Require the student conduct body to call relevant witnesses to provide information regarding the alleged violation.
  2. Will be held at least 5 business days after notice is received by the charged student; exceptions to be made by the student conduct officer in conjunction with the charged student who is considered in violation of policy.
  3. Allow the presence of an advisor who does not act as a legal representative.
  4. Will be recorded by NYIT only.
  5. Require that a decision letter be sent to the student within 15 business days from the conclusion of the student conduct body's deliberation and final decision.